# Which breach and attack simulation vendors provide the best implementation guidance and adoption support so a security team does not buy a platform that sits unused because nobody got trained?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Looking for honest input in the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/breach-and-attack-simulation-bas"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/breach-and-attack-simulation-bas">BAS category</a> on implementation and adoption support, specifically the vendor relationship quality that determines whether a BAS platform actually gets used after purchase or sits as a line item that gets cancelled at renewal.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/picus-security/reviews"><strong>Picus Security</strong></a>: The installation process is straightforward with well-structured documentation, and the support team responds quite fast whenever teams encounter hiccups. The Picus Academy provides self-service training resources, though post-sales training depth in the Academy portal is cited as a gap that has been acknowledged for improvement. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cymulate/reviews"><strong>Cymulate</strong></a>: The intuitive interface reduces the training investment required to reach productivity. Continuous validation can be incorporated into ongoing workflows without a major process change, which is the adoption signal that matters most for avoiding shelf-ware. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/adaptive-security/reviews"><strong>Adaptive Security</strong></a>: From first contact through deployment, the process is described as completely smooth and free of issues, with any questions answered promptly. This proactive support model directly addresses the shelf-ware problem. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/defendify-all-in-one-cybersecurity-solution/reviews"><strong>Defendify All-In-One Cybersecurity Solution</strong></a>: The personalized account manager model provides the human relationship layer that drives adoption beyond the initial implementation. The platform is described as working well even when cyber tasks are managed by a modestly sized team, and the ease of use reduces the training barrier for organizations without dedicated security specialists. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/pentera/reviews"><strong>Pentera</strong></a>: The initial setup simplicity is a specific credit for Pentera, which is described as quite simple and easy, and the autonomous operation model means that once configured, the platform runs without requiring analyst intervention for each test cycle. The AI insights feature reduces the expertise required to interpret findings after deployment, lowering the skill barrier for adoption across a broader security team. </li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For security teams that have successfully adopted a BAS platform beyond the initial trial period, what made the difference between genuine adoption and shelfware? Was it executive sponsorship, integration with existing workflows, or the quality of the vendor's ongoing enablement relationship?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 29 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The shelf-ware risk is real in this category. Platforms that autonomous teams actually use weekly look very different from platforms that get run once, generate a report, and sit idle until renewal.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 23 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4